MAURIN O, FRATTINI B, JOST D, BOUKHARI H, DUWAT A, JOUFFROY R, HERVAULT N, TRICHEREAU J, LEFORT H, TRAVERS S, TOURTIER JP. Use of non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring in prehospital settings; a feasibility study. Med Emergency, MJEM 2019; 7:10.
Key words: blood pressure monitors, plethysmography, prehospital emergency care.
- Authors’ affiliation
- Article history / info
- Conflict of interest statement
Corresponding author: Olga MAURIN, MD
Emergency Department, Fire Brigade of Paris,
1, place Jules Renard, 75017 Paris.
Maurin O, MD1, Frattini B, MD1, Jost D, MD1, Boukhari H, MD1, Duwat A, MD1, Jouffroy R, MD1, Hervault N1, Trichereau J1, Lefort H, MD2, Travers S, MD, PhD1, Tourtier JP, MD, PhD1
1. Emergency Department, Fire Brigade of Paris, 1, place Jules Renard, 75017 Paris, France
2. Emergency Department, Military Teaching Hospital Legouest, 27 avenue de Plantières, 57070 Metz, France.
Category: Original article
Received: Jan. 24, 2018
Revised: Feb. 28, 2018
Accepted: Mar. 14, 2018
There is no conflict of interest to declare
Objective: Non-invasive continuous blood pressure (NICBP) monitoring is an alternative to the standard non-invasive sporadic blood pressure monitoring. It allows measuring mean arterial blood pressure (MBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Its results seem to have a good correlation with the values of invasive continuous blood pressure. The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility of using this device in a pre-hospital setting.
Methods: The measurements taken for adult patients who were treated by Advanced Life Support teams equipped with NICBP (Nexfin™) device from one to 20 August 2015 were analysed prospectively The main outcome parameter was the number of faulty BP measurements obtained by Nexfin™ on one arm compared to the BP cuff on the other arm.
Results: Nine patients were included. The mean age was 53 [40-61]. The number of faulty measurements was 1 for Nexfin™ and 10 for the cuff. There was a good correlation and concordance between the measurements recorded by Nexfin™ and cuff for SBP (77% vs 89%), DBP (70% vs 85%), and MBP (64% vs 82%) respectively.
Conclusion: Although its big size and the low battery life, NICBP monitoring seems to be a valuable option considering its good correlation with the conventional method.